Showing posts with label New Mexico St. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Mexico St. Show all posts

Thursday, October 8, 2015

Thursday Thoughts - Braindroppings

Today, we want to jump all over the landscape and ask a ton of questions, point out a ton of interesting thoughts, and...well, if George Carlin were still around, he'd call these "Braindroppings"! So, here goes!

What makes a team a dynasty? Three titles in a row, like Hawthorn just achieved in the AFL? Does five in fifteen years count, like the NBA's San Antonio Spurs? What about the Patriots, who've won four and been to seven Super Bowls in the Belechick/Brady era (about fourteen years)? Certainly the 1950s-60s Boston Celtics count - they're the very definition of a dynasty! Eight in a row, eleven in thirteen years...but which of those is more important? Is winning over a long period of time, even if you missed a couple in between, "better" than the string over three or four years? What do you think?

Concussion protocols...without question, better than it's been in previous years, when you could convince your coach you were good to go play even when the other team seems to have twice as many players as they legally should have. But please, footy, football, every other kind of real contact sport - don't assume the problem's fixed! The iffy nature of concussions to begin with makes dealing with them nebulous in the best of times, and as we learn more and more about how much time it actually takes to recover from the hit, we have to change how we deal with it. Opinion?

Specials... which is what many coaches call "trick plays". Washington pulled a good one last night, a double pass which scored their first touchdown and led to an upset of USC in LA. SC State had a great one that I first saw the Rams pull on Seattle last year, where you have a punt returner fake like he's getting the punt, when in reality it's the guy on the opposite sideline who's catching the ball and (in last night's game) scoring a touchdown on the runback! (Bethune-Cookman won anyway, however, in a game which may have decided the MEAC.) So, the question that bugs some people is this - are "specials" basically cheating? If you can't win playing "correctly" (or "like men", if you want to really get machismo on this), you have to "resort to trick plays" to try to "cheat" your way to victory! My response - first of all, the plays are legal, so it's not cheating. Second of all, it's the brain versus brawn argument, and football has room for both. If you're okay with a team using the forward pass to win, which many in the early days of the AAFC and NFL weren't for the same reason (c'mon! Be a man and run at me!), you really can't complain about the double pass, or any other "trickeration", as our idol Chris Petersen would say. Petersen, of course, was the one who called the double pass that beat USC last night, and famously brought the house down in the 2007 Fiesta Bowl with a host of trick plays at the end of the game to pull out the Boise State victory over vaunted Oklahoma. What most people forget is that, until a great OU drive and a brainfade interception, Boise had OU soundly beaten (28-10, late in the third) with old-fashioned, hard-nosed, "my linemen are better than yours" football. You've gotta have the guys who can pull it off, too. Your thoughts?

Speaking of Boise v Oklahoma, the perpetual argument over whether a school from outside the Power Five conferences should ever play for a national championship rages, and will continue to until one gets in and then wins the tournament. The CFP folks threw the Group of Five conferences a nice bone by guaranteeing their best team a spot in the high-paying bowl games in the New Year's Six, which is more than they've had. But what if (to choose a team besides Boise, our personal favorite!) Temple or Toledo, both of whom look spectacular this year, goes undefeated in 2015, looks phenomenal in doing so, and two of the power conferences fail to produce any team the committee feels is worthy of a playoff bid? Who's to say that an undefeated Temple isn't a better choice than, say, a three-loss Florida State? What would be wrong with that? Think back to that 2007 Fiesta Bowl, which some say was the best game of all time (as much as I love Boise St, I'd go with USC/Texas in the BCS title game the year Vince Young won it for the Longhorns). Utah had been the first "mid-major" to qualify for a big bowl, but they played a five-loss Pitt team from a pathetic Big East, won, and proved nothing. Boise was the first mid-major to play in the spotlight against a top ten team - and not just any, but 7-time national champion Oklahoma, Big 12 champs, one loss, Adrian Peterson at RB. Somehow the screwed up rankings had BSU #7 and OU #9, but the Sooners were absurd betting favorites - David and Goliath was referenced multiple times in the intro. BSU dominated the game, and if it weren't for a Bronco punt coverage mistake late in the 3rd, Oklahoma was ready to give up. In fact, over the span of games that mid-major teams played in BCS bowl games, their record was 5-2. (And one of those losses was to another mid-major, when they pitted TCU and BSU against each other the year they both qualified. The other was Hawaii's debacle loss to Georgia, proving there's an exception to every rule.) Why can't a Boise St, a Houston, a Memphis, a Toledo, a Temple, a Navy, a Northern Illinois play for the title?

Bodybag games...New Mexico State is getting about a million dollars towards balancing its athletic budget ($4.4 M over, last year) to go to the University of Mississippi and be a forty-three point underdog to a top-notch SEC team. Basically, they're being paid to be the Washington Generals. Remember the Generals? The Globetrotters' perpetual opponents? Name anything about them besides that. Thought so... Ole Miss wants a week off from the gauntlet of the SEC, wants to fill their stadium, give their fans a "guaranteed win" (as LSU will tell you about Jacksonville St, "no such thing"!), and is giving about a one-seventh share of the profits to the opponent for the privilege of being beaten badly. Some teams are notorious for needing these games to stay afloat - Following Football's favorite team, the MEAC's punching bag Savannah State, played Oklahoma St and Florida St in consecutive weeks two years ago, lost the first one 88-0, and would've lost the second to the national champs by worse if they hadn't gone to a running clock in the second half to finish early and avoid a storm coming in. Up here in the Northwest, I always pity the Idaho Vandals, who moved to the big-time because Boise St did, but in little Moscow, Idaho, they don't have the fan base or the resources to afford the lifestyle of an FBS football program. So instead of being the top-notch FCS program they were for decades, rivals with the Montanas of the realm, they're stuck as a bottom-feeder in the lowly Sun Belt conference, taking two payday games a year (this year at USC and Auburn) to financially survive another one-win season. Where's the shame in moving to FCS before your entire program disbands (see UAB)? Why don't schools like NMSU, Idaho, and several others improve both their bottom line AND their competitive results and return to the FCS where their school setting suggests they should be anyway? Your thoughts?

Sunday, September 6, 2015

Bonus college coverage of the Weird, Wild, and Wondrous!

Some interesting / amusing / head-scratching / curious notes from the weekend's action...

1. Kansas State marching band apologizes to Univ of Kansas for ramming a Jayhawk with the Star Trek Enterprise in their marching show. So, the marching band wars have begun...

2. After missing 2/3 of the season last year, Heisman candidate Taysom Hill of BYU will miss all but one half of football in 2015 after injuring his foot against Nebraska yesterday. We feel absolutely heartbroken for the young man, who is nothing but impressive when you hear him speak and watch him perform on the field. Having said that, his back-up is a local Idaho boy, Tanner Mangum, who literally got back from his mission just three months ago and is already a hero after the Hail Mary that made the Cougars 1-0 this season.

3. Similarly, the top defensive player in the country, Scoobie Wright of Arizona, also got injured this weekend, but with surgery should be back in a month or so. Wright is a transcendent player, and you wonder whether a repaired knee will maintain his remarkable athleticism, no matter how "minor" the surgery. Prayers.

4. Thanks to a blocked extra point by the Aggies in the first, much of the Southern Utah/Utah State game took place with the scoreboard set at 6-5. Utah State may have been the least impressive winner of the weekend, lucking out with a punt return TD in the last six minutes to win the game. But their offense did nothing, even with "Chuckie" back at the the helm, against an FCS team. A field goal on a short field, the two point XP which was the difference on the scoreboard, and the special teams touchdown were all they could produce against a lower-echelon team from the Big Sky. Hardly the stuff of the potential Mountain West "favorite". 

5. Week One routs were the order of the day in some parts of the world. We understand the theory, the mutual back-scratching that goes on in these games: The powerhouse conference team wants an easy warm-up game to start the season; the lower-level team needs the paycheck from the host team to balance their athletic budget - win/win situation. But it makes for some unwatchable games: Syracuse 47, Rhode Island 0; Wake Forest 41, Elon 3; Georgia Tech 69, Alcorn St 6; Miami-FL 45, Bethune-Cookman 0... and that was just in the ACC! Of course, when you get the really weak teams like Savannah State or Davidson, you get games with more penalties than offensive yards, with more turnovers than first downs, and so forth. Read the play-by-plays of either of the games these two played on Saturday, and imagine what motivation it would take to watch the game (unless you love car wrecks...).

6. Not a funny...New Mexico State not only got robbed on the field by Florida, they got robbed off the field as burglars broke into their busses and stole the athletic staff's bags. 

7. What do you do if you can't get off the field in time? Like, say, when your shoe comes off? If you play for Bowling Green, you play dead. If you play quarterback for Tennessee, you're not too happy about it....

8. Oh! We almost forgot to mention the name font on Louisville's unis yesterday! 

Thursday, July 2, 2015

Here's our predictions for the rest of the FBS conferences!

Having just posted our predictions for the Power Five conferences (the ACC, Big Ten, Big Twelve, Pac-12, and SEC), it's time to take a look at the other five conferences in the Bowl Subdivision - the American, Conference USA, the MAC, the Mountain West, and the Sun Belt Conference. Here we go!

The American Athletic Conference (formerly the Big East):
*Six teams will vie for the title, so the champ may have two or even three conf losses!
*In the West, Memphis looks the class, although Houston will host them on Nov 14 and could steal the division with a win there.
*Navy's joined a conference for the first time in their 135 years of football! Looking at 3rd...
*Tulane should beat Tulsa at home and lock up 4th, while SMU will be better than last year, even if it doesn't get them out of the basement.
*In the East, it's easier to start at the bottom: UConn 6th, and South Florida 5th.
*All four of the others should thrash each other into a 5-3 logjam! We'll wager on East Carolina 1st, Central Florida 2nd, and Cincinnati 3rd with Temple in 4th. But who knows?
*Given that, we'll take Memphis to win the title game.

Conference USA:
*The winner of the Marshall at Western Kentucky game wins the division and the title.
*As of this moment? We'll lean on the revenge factor and pick the Thundering Herd.
*Middle Tennessee heads a distant pack behind them in the East.
*Pencil in Old Dominion, FIU, FAU, and newcomer UNC-Charlotte in the 4/5/6/7 spots.
*Nobody in the West can punch with WKU or Marshall, but Louisiana Tech should get the chance.
*If not, it'll be Rice - they've developed a good system there.
*UTEP should be able to rise to third, and then it depends on some ball bounces: 
*We're thinking Southern Miss rises to 4th, North Texas 5th, and UTSA falls back to sixth.

Mid-American Conference (the MAC):
*They've marketed a marginal conference well - the Tuesday and Wednesday night games on ESPN, the "#MACtion" tweets, and all the exciting play from clever coaches. 
*The power division here is the West, where by throwing their names in a hat I came up with:
*Northern Illinois winning the division (most experience winning).
*Toledo 2nd, Western Michigan fighting a tough schedule for third, and Ball St in 4th.
*Central Michigan is an easy 5th place pick, because the top 4 are significantly better, and...
*Eastern Michigan is conceivably the worst team in football, at least this year in the FBS.
*In the East, Bowling Green is the class of the division (though they'll lose the title game).
*Only Terry Bowden's Akron has a shot to dethrone them, with Frank Solich's Ohio team in third. 
*Four bad teams round out the MAC-East: U-Mass (bad), Buffalo (bad), Kent St (really bad), and Miami of Ohio (so bad Miami-FL makes them distinguish that they are not the same school). 

Mountain West conference:
* This year, it should be Boise State and the eleven dwarves, but that remains to be proven. 
*Boise's rating numbers are so far above everyone else's that they should be 8-0 in conference, with only a tough out-of-conf schedule to manage. If they goes 3-1 there, they should be playing in a major bowl again. 
*Utah St figures to give them the best battle, although they've hit some rocky stretches here.
*CSU, Air Force, Wyoming, and New Mexico round out the Mountain division, in that order.
*In the West, six mediocre teams fight for the division title, with San Diego St looking like the best candidate for the job,
*Nevada's coming up on the rail for 2nd, and Fresno St's struggling this off-season. 
*San Jose may still be 4th, but not for lack of trying. Meanwhile, Hawaii will put some wins on the home field, and UNLV won't.

Sun Belt Conference:
*I know - this should've been in yellow...but Appalachian St and Georgia Southern are the 1-2 teams here...Only the two of them, plus maybe 3rd place Arkansas St and maybe 4th place Louisiana Lafayette would have a chance to win even one game in any other conference. Even the MAC or Conf-USA!
*Texas State is the best of the rest, and should be able to pull off a .500 or better record in league.
*After that, it's turtles all the way down. 
*Depending on how South Alabama takes to its 10-15 new players who were with UAB last year before their one year hiatus, they could be as high as sixth (maybe fifth?). Or UL-Monroe will slide from 7th up to 6th...
*Below that are four of the five Bottom Five teams to start the season (most likely): Troy in 8th; New Mexica St (9th), Idaho (10th), and Georgia State (11th).

So, to recap - the Bottom Five would be Troy,  NMSU, the Vandals, Georgia State, and Eastern Michigan, along with their intern, newbie Charlotte from the C-USA. (If we're counting Army as a non-Power conference team, then the Cadets from West Point will be in that Bottom mix as well.) Boise State should repeat as the Power of Five rep in the New Year's Six bowl games, and the conference champs will include Appalachian State, Northern Illinois, Marshall, and Memphis.

Tuesday, January 6, 2015

Our "FINAL" college football rankings for the 2014 season!

As the college season comes down to its final game next Monday evening, it's time to present our final tiers and rankings for the 2014 football season. (The asterisk by A1 and A2, of course, mean that the winner of the CFP title game will be A1, and the other team A2. At the moment, though, we have Oregon first.) The tiers don't always fall neatly into groups of six: for example, the top four and TCU seem to be a full step ahead of the next group of schools, so we didn't force a sixth team into that "A" tier. 

Here we go...
FOLLOWING FOOTBALL - FINAL RANKINGS for 2014!
NCAA - BOWL SUBDIVISION Final Final
FF rank Team Conf CfRec BOWL oppont Outcome Record Ranking
A1* Oregon pac 9-1 NC/Rose OhSt/FSU (59-20) 13-1 A1*
A2* Ohio St b10 9-0 NC/Sgr Ore/Ala (42-35) 13-1 A2*
A3 Alabama sec 8-1 Sugar Ohio St 35-42 12-2 A3
A4 Florida St acc 9-0 Rose Oregon 20-59 13-1 A4
A5 TCU b12 8-1 Peach Ole Miss 42-3 12-1 A5
B06 Michigan St b10 7-1 Cotton Baylor 42-41 11-2 B06
B07 Baylor b12 8-1 Cotton Mich St 41-42 11-2 B07
B08 Georgia Tech acc 6-3 Orange Miss St 49-34 11-3 B08
B09 Mississippi St sec 6-2 Orange GaTech 34-49 10-3 B09
B10 Georgia sec 6-2 Dec 30 Louisv 37-14 10-3 B10
B11 UCLA pac 6-3 Jan 2 K State 40-35 10-3 B11
C12 Ole Miss sec 5-3 Peach TCU 3-42 9-4 C12
C13 Missouri sec 7-2 Jan 1 Minnes 33-17 11-3 C13
C14 Kansas St b12 7-2 Jan 2 UCLA 35-40 9-4 C14
C15 Clemson acc 6-2 Dec 29 Okla 40-6 10-3 C15
C16 Wisconsin b10 7-2 Jan 1 Auburn 34-31 11-3 C16
C17 Auburn sec 5-3 Jan 1 Wisc 31-34 8-5 C17
D18 Boise St mw 8-1 Fiesta Arizona 38-30 12-2 D18
D19 Arizona St pac 6-3 Dec 27 Duke 36-31 10-3 D19
D20 USC pac 6-3 Dec 27 Nebrska 45-42 9-4 D20
D21 Arizona pac 7-3 Fiesta Boise St 30-38 10-4 D21
D22 LSU sec 4-4 Dec 30 Notre D 28-31 8-5 D22
D23 Utah pac 5-4 Dec 20 Colo St 45-10 9-4 D23
E24 Texas A&M sec 3-5 Dec 29 WVU 45-37 8-5 E24
E25 Stanford pac 5-4 Dec 30 Maryl 45-21 8-5 E25
E26 Arkansas sec 2-6 Dec 29 Texas 31-7 7-6 E26
E27 Nebraska b10 5-3 Dec 27 USC 42-45 9-4 E27
E28 Oklahoma b12 5-4 Dec 29 Clemson 6-40 8-5 E28
E29 Louisville acc 5-3 Dec 30 Georgia 14-37 9-4 E29
E30 Marshall cusa 8-1 Dec 23 NIU 52-23 13-1 E30
E31 Notre Dame ind * Dec 30 LSU 31-28 8-5 E31
E32 Minnesota b10 5-3 Jan 1 Mizzou 17-33 8-5 E32
E33 Duke acc 5-3 Dec 27 Az St 31-36 9-4 E33
F34 Florida sec 4-4 Jan 3 ECU 28-20 7-5 F34
F35 South Carolina sec 3-5 Dec 27 MiaFL 24-21 7-6 F35
F36 Colorado St mw 6-2 Dec 20 Utah 10-45 10-3 F36
F37 Memphis aac 7-1 Dec 22 BYU 55-48 10-3 F37
G38 West Virginia b12 5-4 Dec 29 TA&M 37-45 7-6 G38
G39 Washington pac 4-5 Jan 2 OkSt 22-30 8-6 G39
G40 Cincinnati aac 6-1 Dec 27 VaTech 17-33 8-4 G40
G41 Miami-FL acc 3-5 Dec 27 SoCarol 21-24 6-7 G41
G42 Utah St mw 6-2 Dec 20 UTEP 21-6 10-4 G42
H43 North Carolina St acc 3-5 Dec 26 UCF 34-27 8-5 H43
H44 Maryland b10 4-4 Dec 30 Stanfd 21-45 7-6 H44
H45 Tennessee sec 3-5 Jan 2 Iowa 45-28 7-6 H45
H46 Northern Illinois mac 8-1 Dec 23 Marshl 23-52 11-3 H46
H47 Rutgers b10 3-5 Dec 26 UNC 40-21 8-5 H47
H48 Penn St b10 2-6 Dec 27 BC 31-30 7-6 H48
H49 Air Force mw 5-3 Dec 20 WMU 38-24 10-3 H49
I50 Texas b12 5-4 Dec 29 Arkans 7-31 6-7 I50
I51 Oklahoma St b12 4-5 Jan 2 Wash 30-22 7-6 I51
I52 Iowa b10 4-4 Jan 2 Tenn 28-45 7-6 I52
I53 Boston College acc 4-4 Dec 27 PennSt 30-31 7-6 I53
I54 Kentucky sec 2-6 5-7 I54
J55 Central Florida aac 7-1 Dec 26 NCSt 27-34 9-4 J55
J56 East Carolina aac 5-3 Jan 3 Florida 20-28 8-5 J56
J57 BYU ind * Dec 22 Memph 48-55 8-5 J57
J58 Louisiana Tech cusa 7-2 Dec 26 Illinois 35-18 9-5 J58
J59 Virginia Tech acc 3-5 Dec 27 Cincinn 33-17 7-6 J59
J60 Navy ind * Dec 23 SDSU 17-16 8-5 J60
K61 North Carolina acc 4-4 Dec 26 Rutgers 21-40 6-7 K61
K62 Georgia Southern sun 8-0 9-3 K62
K63 UL-Lafayette sun 7-1 Dec 20 Nevada 16-3 9-4 K63
K64 Western Kentucky cusa 4-4 Dec 24 CMU 49-48 8-5 K64
K65 California pac 3-6 5-7 K65
K66 Oregon St pac 2-7 5-7 K66
K67 Michigan b10 3-5 5-7 K67
Final Final
FF rank Team Conf CfRec BOWL oppont Outcome Record Ranking
L68 Western Michigan mac 6-2 Dec 20 AFA 24-38 8-5 L68
L69 Houston aac 5-3 Jan 2 Pitt 35-34 8-5 L69
L70 Pitt acc 4-4 Jan 2 Houston 34-35 6-7 L70
L71 Illinois b10 3-5 Dec 26 LaTech 18-35 6-7 L71
L72 Nevada mw 4-4 Dec 20 ULL 3-16 7-6 L72
L73 Toledo mac 7-1 Jan 4 Ark St 63-44 9-4 L73
M74 Texas Tech b12 2-7 4-8 M74
M75 Virginia acc 3-5 5-7 M75
M76 Rice cusa 5-3 Dec 24 Fresno 30-6 8-5 M76
M77 San Diego St mw 5-3 Dec 23 Navy 16-17 7-6 M77
M78 Northwestern b10 3-5 5-7 M78
N79 Temple aac 4-4 6-6 N79
N80 Bowling Green mac 5-4 Dec 20 SoAlab 33-28 8-6 N80
N81 Arkansas St sun 5-3 Jan 4 Toledo 44-63 7-6 N81
N82 Central Michigan mac 5-3 Dec 24 WKU 48-49 7-6 N82
O83 Fresno St mw 5-4 Dec 24 Rice 6-30 6-8 O83
O84 UTEP cusa 5-3 Dec 20 UtahSt 6-21 7-6 O84
O85 UAB cusa 4-4 6-6 O85
O86 Washington St pac 2-7 3-9 O86
O87 Texas St sun 5-3 7-5 O87
O88 Appalachian St sun 6-2 7-5 O88
O89 Kansas b12 1-8 3-9 O89
O90 Syracuse acc 1-7 3-9 O90
O91 South Alabama sun 5-3 Dec 20 BGSU 28-33 6-7 O91
P92 Purdue b10 2-6 4-8 P92
P93 Ohio mac 4-4 6-6 P93
P94 Middle Tennessee cusa 5-3 6-6 P94
P95 Colorado pac 0-9 2-10 P95
P96 Iowa St b12 0-9 2-10 P96
Q097 UL-Monroe sun 3-5 4-8 Q097
Q098 Ball St mac 4-4 5-7 Q098
Q099 Wyoming mw 2-6 4-8 Q099
Q100 Buffalo mac 3-4 5-6 Q100
Q101 Wake Forest acc 1-7 3-9 Q101
Q102 Indiana b10 0-8 3-9 Q102
R103 Hawai'i mw 3-5 4-9 R103
R104 Old Dominion cusa 4-4 6-6 R104
R105 South Florida aac 3-5 4-8 R105
R106 New Mexico mw 2-6 4-8 R106
R107 Vanderbilt sec 0-8 3-9 R107
R108 FIU cusa 3-5 4-8 R108
S109 Florida Atlantic cusa 2-6 3-9 S109
S110 Akron mac 3-5 5-7 S110
S111 Tulane aac 2-6 3-9 S111
S112 Army ind * 4-8 S112
S113 North Texas cusa 2-6 4-8 S113
S114 Southern Miss cusa 1-7 3-9 S114
T115 San Jose St mw 2-6 3-9 T115
T116 UT-San Antonio sun 3-4 4-7 T116
T117 Miami-OH mac 2-6 2-10 T117
T118 Troy sun 3-5 3-9 T118
T119 Tulsa aac 2-6 2-10 T119
T120 UNLV mw 1-7 2-11 T120
U121 Kent St mac 1-6 2-9 U121
U122 U Massachusetts mac 3-5 3-9 U122
U123 U Conn aac 1-7 2-10 U123
U124 Idaho sun 1-7 1-10 U124
V125 Eastern Michigan mac 1-7 2-10 V125
V126 SMU aac 1-7 1-11 V126
V127 New Mexico St sun 1-7 2-10 V127
V128 Georgia St sun 0-8 1-11 V128








a few thoughts...

...the SEC ended up with nine teams in spots #3, 9, 10, 12, 13, 17, 22, 24, and 26 (including ALL SEVEN of the SEC West schools!)...but none in the championship game (and only one in the top 8, fewer than the Big Ten, Big Twelve, OR the ACC!).
...the conferences tended to spread themselves out at the top relatively well: the top 5 came from five different conferences (all five power conferences, naturally), and no school had more than two teams in the top 9.
...Within the top four tiers (#1-23), there are seven SEC teams, six Pac-12 teams (#1, 11, 19, 20, 21, and 23), three Big Ten teams (#2, 6, and 16), three Big 12 teams (#5, 7, and 14), three ACC teams (#4, 8, and 15), and one Mountain West "Group Of Five" interloper (Boise St at #18). 
...In the end, our top four matched the CFP committee's Top four on Dec 7, albeit in a different order (we originally had Oregon first), which is why we resisted moving TCU past any of them into the top 4 despite their brutally dominant performance. However bad the Seminole loss was, it was to a top 4 team.
...Looking at our Bottom 14 teams, we find that there were five from the Sun Belt (with Georgia St and New Mexico St taking the lowest rungs in tier V), four from the MAC, and three from the old Big East, now called the AAC (including SMU, who resided winless in the cellar ALL season long until their victory on the last day of the season over UConn!).
..Next fall, we plan to start from this ranking, even though teams are going to change DRASTICALLY between now and then: without game data to evaluate teams, there's no real way to gauge how to change our tiers. (Of course, once the games start, we'll be VERY willing to move teams dramatically if there's a dramatic difference!) The other principle we abide by is that actually ranking teams early in the season is futile and pointless, so all you'll see are the tiers for awhile, just as we did this year.