As the college football playoff committee puts out its rankings tonight, and Following Football has done the same over the last two days for all 285 pro and college teams we cover, it's a great time to look at which teams have had a surprisingly UP season, and which ones have been startlingly DOWN...
WHO'S UP? Well, what about the Cincinnati Bengals and the Carolina Panthers? Everyone who saw both of them at 7-0 starting November raise your hands. OK, we've identified the liars in the room...
WHO'S DOWN? It's not hard to find struggling teams in the NFL, but a couple we saw in the playoffs last year are the Baltimore Ravens and the Detroit Lions. Tough schedule, sure - close games, yes - but somewhere in there, you've got to stand up and win a couple of those games.
WHO'S UP? Three "usual suspects": the Green Bay Packers, the Denver Broncos, and the New England Patriots. Remarkable to watch Peyton be Peyton again, but Rodgers and Brady have left no doubt that they're still at the top of their games. And all three have defenses to get them the ball.
WHO'S DOWN? Again, who do you expect? The Tennessee Titans, of course, who just fired another coach...the Cleveland Browns, who continue to put up with Manziel for some odd reason...the Chicago Bears weren't expected to do much, and still haven't lived up to expectations... and even with their shiny new QB, the Tampa Bay Bucs are barely better than they were at this point last year.
WHO'S UP? There are signs of life in Oakland...in Minnesota...in Atlanta...in St. Louis. Parity is always the stated goal of the NFL admin, but what you really want is the feeling as a fan base that any year could be THE YEAR!
WHO'S DOWN? When you've got a fan base like the Sasktachewan RoughRiders do, arguably the best in the Canadian Football League, and you were expecting to be contending for the Grey Cup, when you were right on the heels of the eventual champion Calgary Stampeders all season...and you go a miserable two and fifteen heading into the final week of the season...yeah, the green is blue this year. The Riders were actually eliminated from playoff contention six weeks ago...in a league where 2/3 of the teams make the playoffs. THAT'S impressive in its badness.
WHO'S UP? When you went 2-16 last year in your first campaign as an expansion franchise, you can be forgiven if a successful second season in your mind was, say, six wins. Looking at the two expansion clubs in the AFL (Gold Coast and GWS), they went through about that - two bad years, then two mediocre years. But instead, the Ottawa RedBlacks are one win away from an Eastern Division championship in their second year - already guaranteed a winning record at 11-6, all they need to do is win OR not lose by more than five points at home on Saturday to the Hamilton Ti-Cats...not the first choice of opponents in this situation, especially since it's the Ti-Cats who will earn the title if you fail. But just to have this opportunity in your sophomore campaign! CONGRATULATIONS, OTTAWA!
WHO'S DOWN? My attention span for Canadian football once the American season hit full steam in late September. It was frustrating, because I knew I didn't have the time or energy to stay abreast of every single thing in the NFL, NCAA, and the CFL - and as the footy season was reaching its climax down under, it was the mid-to-late weeks of the Canadian season that got the short shrift. To our readers, I apologize. But of course, all we can do is our best, and we'll continue to do that for you.
WHO'S UP? At the moment, we have our top four "theoretically playoff bound" FBS teams (in the humble opinion of Following Football ACNC!) - LSU, Clemson, Alabama, Notre Dame. To most observers we've heard, the first two names are almost indisputable at the moment (things change quickly in college football, though!), and the other two could be replaced by any of close to a dozen teams: TCU, Baylor, Oklahoma, Oklahoma St, Michigan St, Ohio St, Florida, Stanford, Iowa, Utah, even Memphis or Toledo. (Probably not Idaho, though.)
WHO'S DOWN? Which teams thought they'd be in the mix at this point and aren't? There are some obvious candidates: Georgia, Auburn, Oregon, USC, Tennessee, There are some others whose fan bases might have thought it feasible - but that's another story.
WHO'S UP? There are some remarkable positive stories this fall of teams who weren't expected to fare as successfully as they have, as there are every year. That doesn't make them any less worth applauding: Florida (new head coach Jim McElwain has them sitting at #7 on the Following Football ranking at the moment; finished the 2014 season at #34), Michigan (Harbaugh took a team who finished at #67 last year, bottom half of the FBS, and has them at #14 right now), Houston (up from #69 last year to an undefeated 8-0 at #21 and looking at a possible New Year's bowl); and Temple (similar story arc, moving from #79 to current #22, having just taken Notre Dame to the brink). There are lower eschelon stories as well: Southern Miss moved from tier S up to its current tier L; Tulsa has bounded from tier T up to tier N this year. Vanderbilt from tier R up to its present place in tier I; and Northwestern, who beat Stanford to start the year, Duke for its only legitimate defeat (ahem, Miami), and moved from last year's tier M and #78 all the way into tier G and position #35.
WHO'S DOWN? And then... there are the sob stories. The ones you tsk tsk about behind their backs. The ones who (in your opinion) deserve a bad year every once in a while... How about Texas? Charlie Strong's first year looked promising! But with a blowout, embarrassing loss to Notre Dame (well, ok), embarrassing near-misses against California and OK State (hmmm...), a bad loss at TCU (eww...), a surprise win in the Shootout (hey! Maybe...) followed by definitive losses to two foes they used to pick their teeth with the last two weeks: K-State and Iowa State. Read that again. Iowa State! The Texas offense was not only shut out, they never got past the ISU 40 yard line.
But that pales next to Nebraska, who fired a coach who gave them nine wins a season every year - AGAIN. A decade ago, they fired Frank Solich because he wasn't Tom Osborne. The man they hired to replace him...was no Frank Solich. Disaster - they didn't even make .500! In desperation, they brought in NU guy Bo Pelini - colorful, successful, nine wins a season, just like Solich (who went on to be one of the most successful coaches in MAC history). Seven years of Pelini NOT being Tom Osborne was enough for the faithful, and they brought in Mike Riley, a very nice man with a mediocre program at Oregon State, who has produced a mediocre program at Nebraska, finding exciting ways to lose close games to good teams and sometimes to bad teams like Purdue last weekend.
South Carolina was doing badly enough that the Head Ball Coach simply walked away into retirement. Central Florida saw the same story with Head Resume Inflator in the lead walking role. Whether the story ends the same way at Virginia Tech in Frank Beamer's last year remains to be seen. It looks like Minnesota's going to be hanged if they allow Jerry Kill's epilepsy-induced retirement to end the same way, thankfully.
WHAT'S NEXT? Who knows? And isn't that the beauty of football? It's the best reality show there is - all the drama, the competition, the tension of the staged TV events, except it's actual reality! There IS no script! Maybe Texas turns it around! Maybe Florida nosedives the rest of the way! Maybe Jim Harbaugh takes Michigan to four miraculous victories against Ohio State, Iowa in the B1G title game, the semifinal and the NC game, and the Blue rule the nation! Or...just as unlikely...maybe they lose every game from here on out, including a 59-0 shutout by the Buckeyes. That's the point - we can't know ahead of time! So sit back, turn on the TV, go to a game if you're close enough, and enjoy the ride!
A forum for a variety of football forms - Australian Footy, American (college, NFL, and some HS), Canadian, and even a little round futbol and rounded rugby football when it comes up.
Showing posts with label Michigan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michigan. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 3, 2015
UPS and DOWNS for Tuesday, the first week of November!
Labels:
Alabama,
Bengals,
Broncos,
Clemson,
Lions,
LSU,
Michigan,
Nebraska,
Notre Dame,
Ottawa,
Packers,
Panthers,
Patriots,
Raiders,
Ravens,
Saskatchewan,
South Carolina,
Texas,
UCF,
Ups And Downs
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
UPS and DOWNS for the Last Week of October!
Yes, we've been negligent in our UPS and DOWNS this month, so let's see if we can make it up to you today with a BIG long list!
UP to the FIVE UNDEFEATED teams still left in the NFL at Hallow'een! I've heard different dates, but it's been many, many years since we've had five 6-0 teams - Green Bay, Cincinnati, Denver, Carolina, and New England. They're certainly deserving of their hallowed spots - New England and Green Bay were the consensus picks for Super Bowl combatants; Cincinnati's been tested repeatedly and looks better than any previous year in the Dalton era; and Cam Newton and that Carolina defense are doing just as well as Peyton Manning and that amazing Bronco defense! (Rephrase that: Cam's doing more that the legend, but the Denver D has been more impressive by far than any in the league.)
DOWN to the MOST DISAPPOINTING teams in the NFL this season... Baltimore fell to 1-6 last night, although a valiant effort to come back against a strong Arizona club fell short in the end zone. They've been within a score in every one of their games, and the Harbaugh coaching line will keep them competitive...but as for their own playoff hopes? Six losses is probably already as many as they can afford, and they're not going 9-0 the rest of the way. Seattle? Too early to say. Yes, they've lost more than expected, but they looked good against the Niners Thursday night. Can you call Chicago, Tampa, Tennessee, or Jacksonville "disappointing" if you weren't expecting anything from them? I think not. Certainly Detroit belongs on that list...
UP to the GREATEST NAME in modern football! Yesterday, in an effort to rearrange deck chairs on the Titanic, the Lions reneged on their promise not to change any coaches and changed coaches, firing the OC and replacing him with....wait for it...Jim Bob Cooter, a man who not only has the greatest name in the the business, but also a creative criminal record to boot: while he was at Tennessee several years ago, he was convicted of "aggravated assault" because he went into a woman's home, stripped down to his underwear, and climbed in bed with her. Had it been his wife, no worries. However, she didn't know him....OOPS! A promising move for Detroit.
DOWN to the MIAMI HURRICANE fans and alumni... who deserve whatever terrible coach they receive now that they've singlehandedly forced the ouster of Al Golden as their football coach. Certainly, the AD had no choice after the 58-0 debacle against Clemson, and even if you want to admit that the players seemed to play without interest, the firing only became necessary because the overzealous "fans" (remember, the word is short for "fanatic") demanded it. NOW...put yourself in the place of a prospective coach. Do you want to coach at Miami, having seen what they did to your predecessor? Miami was still 4-3, you know - not a bad season, although admittedly not national championship contenders. The expectations for a mid-level ACC program - and make no mistake: with the facility issues they have there, it IS a mid-level program! - are way overboard. If the poor fellow who takes the job ends his first four seasons has the same 32-25 record Golden did, I'll be impressed. And surprised.
UP to the DEPENDABILITY of the BOTTOM FEEDERS! As a phootball prophet of the lowest order, I depend on the reliability of the teams I work with in order to phorcast the outcomes of the games they play. We've seen an amazing array of turnabouts this year - for example, we expected Michigan to beat Michigan St, and they did...for the first 59:55 of the game, pre-punt. We thought Florida St would win over my son's beloved Ramblin' Wreck of Georgia Tech...until a field goal block returned for a game winner changed that outcome. We've seen ridiculous outcomes across the board - games I was absolutely SURE about came out the other way. AND YET, the one constant that keeps us above .500, above the line of sheer guess work? Well, it's the bottom feeder teams - the Savannah States, the Davidsons, the Missouri States, the New Mexico States, the Charlottes and Eastern Michigans, the Kansases of the world, that remind us that the sun will come up tomorrow in the east, set in the west, and repeat again and again. Knowing that Savannah will go to Stillwater and lose by eighty...knowing that one more Davidson Wildcat loss may be the one that pushes its Sagarin rating into negative numbers, knowing that the MVC is made up of nine amazing FCS teams...and Missouri State. That's what makes a prognosticator look smart!
DOWN to the GREG HARDY situation... I hate to say this, because it'll sound terrible...but I hope there's something medically or psychologically wrong with the Dallas Cowboys' two-game veteran defensive lineman Greg Hardy. If not, it means he's simply a complete a-hole, a jerk of gargantuan proportions. To barge into the special teams huddle (of which you have NO business being in at ALL, not being on special teams) and literally assault the ST coach is, by most standards of business practice, grounds for firing on its own, To then continue the infantile behavior with Dez Bryant (THERE's irony - Dez is the voice of reason?) and in the farcical press conference (no comment next question - wait for the question, meathead!) would be adequate grounds to be removed from the league, as no team would want you representing them in a pig-calling contest, much less in front of cameras ever again. But the real piece d'resistance, in my opinion, is his team's owner, the brilliant Jerry Jones, not only excusing his behavior (for which his coach, Jason Garrett, will not punish him at all), but praising his behavior as the kind of passion that they want their leaders to show! Congratulations, Dallas! You just sunk to number 33 on the list of my favorite NFL teams! (And yes, I realize there are only 32 teams. #32 on my list right now is being forced to watch highlights of the Chuck Pagano Special Teams Instructional video on permanent replay...)
DOWN to the idiots who would use the anonymity of Twitter and other social media to threaten athletes (AND their FAMILIES!) in ways they would never have the juevos to do in person. Without going into details, the fanatics who called out the poor Michigan punter following his dropped ball at the end of the Michigan State game were bad enough...the ones insulting the Dallas punt returner after his gaffe Sunday night were just as bad, although at least he's a professional athlete and "signed up" for the criticism. But the morons who went after his wife? What the heck? How do you figure she had anything to do with the dropped punt? Would they have gotten in her face had they met in the stadium? ...Wait a minute...maybe they would have. Didn't Giselle Brady have to deal with that after the Patriots lost a Super Bowl once? ...Sigh. It's amazing we ever evolved far enough as a species to come down from the trees. Apparently, we still fling our feces at each other for fun...
UP TO ALL OF YOU WHO READ THIS BLOG! Seriously, there's no profit margin or income of any sort involved in this project. It's simply a chance to continue a passion for football and the unpredictability of its outcomes, something my late wife and I started a few years ago on Facebook and then moved over to the blogosphere one year ago this month. To everyone who's ever read our work, which is now just my work, unfortunately... Thank you.
UP to the FIVE UNDEFEATED teams still left in the NFL at Hallow'een! I've heard different dates, but it's been many, many years since we've had five 6-0 teams - Green Bay, Cincinnati, Denver, Carolina, and New England. They're certainly deserving of their hallowed spots - New England and Green Bay were the consensus picks for Super Bowl combatants; Cincinnati's been tested repeatedly and looks better than any previous year in the Dalton era; and Cam Newton and that Carolina defense are doing just as well as Peyton Manning and that amazing Bronco defense! (Rephrase that: Cam's doing more that the legend, but the Denver D has been more impressive by far than any in the league.)
DOWN to the MOST DISAPPOINTING teams in the NFL this season... Baltimore fell to 1-6 last night, although a valiant effort to come back against a strong Arizona club fell short in the end zone. They've been within a score in every one of their games, and the Harbaugh coaching line will keep them competitive...but as for their own playoff hopes? Six losses is probably already as many as they can afford, and they're not going 9-0 the rest of the way. Seattle? Too early to say. Yes, they've lost more than expected, but they looked good against the Niners Thursday night. Can you call Chicago, Tampa, Tennessee, or Jacksonville "disappointing" if you weren't expecting anything from them? I think not. Certainly Detroit belongs on that list...
UP to the GREATEST NAME in modern football! Yesterday, in an effort to rearrange deck chairs on the Titanic, the Lions reneged on their promise not to change any coaches and changed coaches, firing the OC and replacing him with....wait for it...Jim Bob Cooter, a man who not only has the greatest name in the the business, but also a creative criminal record to boot: while he was at Tennessee several years ago, he was convicted of "aggravated assault" because he went into a woman's home, stripped down to his underwear, and climbed in bed with her. Had it been his wife, no worries. However, she didn't know him....OOPS! A promising move for Detroit.
DOWN to the MIAMI HURRICANE fans and alumni... who deserve whatever terrible coach they receive now that they've singlehandedly forced the ouster of Al Golden as their football coach. Certainly, the AD had no choice after the 58-0 debacle against Clemson, and even if you want to admit that the players seemed to play without interest, the firing only became necessary because the overzealous "fans" (remember, the word is short for "fanatic") demanded it. NOW...put yourself in the place of a prospective coach. Do you want to coach at Miami, having seen what they did to your predecessor? Miami was still 4-3, you know - not a bad season, although admittedly not national championship contenders. The expectations for a mid-level ACC program - and make no mistake: with the facility issues they have there, it IS a mid-level program! - are way overboard. If the poor fellow who takes the job ends his first four seasons has the same 32-25 record Golden did, I'll be impressed. And surprised.
UP to the DEPENDABILITY of the BOTTOM FEEDERS! As a phootball prophet of the lowest order, I depend on the reliability of the teams I work with in order to phorcast the outcomes of the games they play. We've seen an amazing array of turnabouts this year - for example, we expected Michigan to beat Michigan St, and they did...for the first 59:55 of the game, pre-punt. We thought Florida St would win over my son's beloved Ramblin' Wreck of Georgia Tech...until a field goal block returned for a game winner changed that outcome. We've seen ridiculous outcomes across the board - games I was absolutely SURE about came out the other way. AND YET, the one constant that keeps us above .500, above the line of sheer guess work? Well, it's the bottom feeder teams - the Savannah States, the Davidsons, the Missouri States, the New Mexico States, the Charlottes and Eastern Michigans, the Kansases of the world, that remind us that the sun will come up tomorrow in the east, set in the west, and repeat again and again. Knowing that Savannah will go to Stillwater and lose by eighty...knowing that one more Davidson Wildcat loss may be the one that pushes its Sagarin rating into negative numbers, knowing that the MVC is made up of nine amazing FCS teams...and Missouri State. That's what makes a prognosticator look smart!
DOWN to the GREG HARDY situation... I hate to say this, because it'll sound terrible...but I hope there's something medically or psychologically wrong with the Dallas Cowboys' two-game veteran defensive lineman Greg Hardy. If not, it means he's simply a complete a-hole, a jerk of gargantuan proportions. To barge into the special teams huddle (of which you have NO business being in at ALL, not being on special teams) and literally assault the ST coach is, by most standards of business practice, grounds for firing on its own, To then continue the infantile behavior with Dez Bryant (THERE's irony - Dez is the voice of reason?) and in the farcical press conference (no comment next question - wait for the question, meathead!) would be adequate grounds to be removed from the league, as no team would want you representing them in a pig-calling contest, much less in front of cameras ever again. But the real piece d'resistance, in my opinion, is his team's owner, the brilliant Jerry Jones, not only excusing his behavior (for which his coach, Jason Garrett, will not punish him at all), but praising his behavior as the kind of passion that they want their leaders to show! Congratulations, Dallas! You just sunk to number 33 on the list of my favorite NFL teams! (And yes, I realize there are only 32 teams. #32 on my list right now is being forced to watch highlights of the Chuck Pagano Special Teams Instructional video on permanent replay...)
DOWN to the idiots who would use the anonymity of Twitter and other social media to threaten athletes (AND their FAMILIES!) in ways they would never have the juevos to do in person. Without going into details, the fanatics who called out the poor Michigan punter following his dropped ball at the end of the Michigan State game were bad enough...the ones insulting the Dallas punt returner after his gaffe Sunday night were just as bad, although at least he's a professional athlete and "signed up" for the criticism. But the morons who went after his wife? What the heck? How do you figure she had anything to do with the dropped punt? Would they have gotten in her face had they met in the stadium? ...Wait a minute...maybe they would have. Didn't Giselle Brady have to deal with that after the Patriots lost a Super Bowl once? ...Sigh. It's amazing we ever evolved far enough as a species to come down from the trees. Apparently, we still fling our feces at each other for fun...
UP TO ALL OF YOU WHO READ THIS BLOG! Seriously, there's no profit margin or income of any sort involved in this project. It's simply a chance to continue a passion for football and the unpredictability of its outcomes, something my late wife and I started a few years ago on Facebook and then moved over to the blogosphere one year ago this month. To everyone who's ever read our work, which is now just my work, unfortunately... Thank you.
Monday, October 19, 2015
Maybe you just shouldn't punt!
After last night's disaster by the Indianapolis Colts (represented here, including a version by the Maine 1-AA team that shows how it might have meant to work), and the unbelievable last play of the Michigan/Michigan State game Saturday, perhaps we should all just go Pulaski Academy and never punt the ball again!
There's been a serious move in the "punt-less" direction over the last two years, where coaches "challenge the conventional wisdom" by going for it on fourth down around midfield, or even slightly on their own side of the field if it's short enough; but no somber commitment to the cause. I consider myself somewhat conservative in my approach, and here's the set of general rules I'd use as a head football coach if I were ever forced into the job...
Past midfield? Never punt.
Between your own 30 and midfield?Go for 4th and anything less than 3. Maybe 4-5, depending...
Behind your own 30? Go for 4th and 1 or less. Maybe 2...
(Subject to what kind of team I have, the opponent, the conditions, the time left in the game, etc.)
So, why don't more coaches punt less - like, WAY less? Here's the take of Paul Dalen, who wrote the piece for SB Nation about the math behind Pulaski's work linked above...
(Now, by the way, Kevin Kelley of Pulaski Academy also believes in onside kickoffs after almost every score - and they score a LOT; they're 10-0 this season - and now, he's planning on incorporating rugby style lateral passing into virtually every downfield play, something I've wondered about for years! WHY, if we think it'll work on the last play of the game, do we NEVER use downfield laterals the REST of the game? Wouldn't practicing it make it less dangerous by an order of magnitude or more?)
There's been a serious move in the "punt-less" direction over the last two years, where coaches "challenge the conventional wisdom" by going for it on fourth down around midfield, or even slightly on their own side of the field if it's short enough; but no somber commitment to the cause. I consider myself somewhat conservative in my approach, and here's the set of general rules I'd use as a head football coach if I were ever forced into the job...
Past midfield? Never punt.
Between your own 30 and midfield?Go for 4th and anything less than 3. Maybe 4-5, depending...
Behind your own 30? Go for 4th and 1 or less. Maybe 2...
(Subject to what kind of team I have, the opponent, the conditions, the time left in the game, etc.)
So, why don't more coaches punt less - like, WAY less? Here's the take of Paul Dalen, who wrote the piece for SB Nation about the math behind Pulaski's work linked above...
I don't think this kind of analysis would be a surprise to any decent coach. So, why do coaches "play it safe" (as if it weren't safer to make the choice to score more points)?
The answer to that, I think, lies in the way that we view errors of commission versus errors of omission. Or in other words, a coach that makes a choice to punt the ball from the 20-yard line would be viewed as making sound decisions, whereas one that chooses to go for it on the 20-yard line is considered a risk-taker. If the decision to punt turns out to be the decision that gives the ball back and the opponent then scores a TD, then the decision to punt is hardly considered as part of the evaluation of the sequence of events. If the decision to go for it fails and the opponent scores a TD, then the decision will be second-guessed ad nauseum. The result of both decisions is the same, but one would be criticized much more harshly than the other.
Humans are funny creatures.
We are indeed...we are indeed.(Now, by the way, Kevin Kelley of Pulaski Academy also believes in onside kickoffs after almost every score - and they score a LOT; they're 10-0 this season - and now, he's planning on incorporating rugby style lateral passing into virtually every downfield play, something I've wondered about for years! WHY, if we think it'll work on the last play of the game, do we NEVER use downfield laterals the REST of the game? Wouldn't practicing it make it less dangerous by an order of magnitude or more?)
Labels:
Colts,
funny,
Maine,
Michigan,
Michigan St,
oddities,
Pulaski Academy,
rugby
Friday, May 29, 2015
Is it too early to talk Top 30 in college football?
Yes. Yes it is.
However, Sports Illustrated doesn't think so, and they've put out their "post-spring camp Top 25" plus five more, and it's an interesting list to peruse...
1. Ohio State 11. Stanford 21. Georgia Tech
2. Baylor 12. Ole Miss 22. Oklahoma
3. Auburn 13. Arizona 23. BYU
4. Alabama 14. USC 24. LSU
5. Michigan St 15. Boise State 25. Oklahoma St
6. TCU 16. Clemson 26. Arkansas
7. Notre Dame 17. Missouri 27. Utah
8. UCLA 18. Georgia 28. Mississippi St
9. Florida St 19. Arizona St 29. Texas
10. Oregon 20. Wisconsin 30. Michigan
I find this list absolutely fascinating to contemplate, which is why I post it. At Following Football, we do NOT rank football teams until somewhen in mid-October at the earliest. What we do do is group teams into what we call "tiers"; eventually there'll be about twenty tiers, A through T or so, even when they're ranked (that's also how we project game outcomes) but at the very beginning of the season? We'll divide them up into two, three, four tiers...then six or seven...then maybe eight or ten..until we have enough information to rank them all, #1-127. (UAB football, rest in peace.)
But about THIS list? Look at these crunchy tidbits!
> Auburn 3 and Alabama 4? Delicious!
> OSU deserves #1, but MSU isn't very far behind at #5...
> Baylor at 2 and TCU way back at 6? But TCU's the one bringing their QB back!
> How about this one? Everett Golson goes to perennial playoff contender Florida St, #9... but the team he left is #7!
> Look at the Pac-12! UCLA #8, Oregon #10, Stanford #11, Arizona #13, USC #14, and Arizona State at #19! (Even Utah sneaking in at 27!) THAT will be a packed conference!
> The "Group of Five" better figure out a way to defeat Boise State! They start the season ranked this year...even a loss or two may not knock them out of the top non-Power spot! (Only BYU sits on the list, at #23, to challenge.)
> Oklahoma 22 and Okee State 25? Fun!
> Arkansas 26 and Texas 29? (Or OU/UT? Or...)
> And look who they've got sneaking in at #30! High hopes, indeed, Mr. Harbaugh!
However, Sports Illustrated doesn't think so, and they've put out their "post-spring camp Top 25" plus five more, and it's an interesting list to peruse...
1. Ohio State 11. Stanford 21. Georgia Tech
2. Baylor 12. Ole Miss 22. Oklahoma
3. Auburn 13. Arizona 23. BYU
4. Alabama 14. USC 24. LSU
5. Michigan St 15. Boise State 25. Oklahoma St
6. TCU 16. Clemson 26. Arkansas
7. Notre Dame 17. Missouri 27. Utah
8. UCLA 18. Georgia 28. Mississippi St
9. Florida St 19. Arizona St 29. Texas
10. Oregon 20. Wisconsin 30. Michigan
I find this list absolutely fascinating to contemplate, which is why I post it. At Following Football, we do NOT rank football teams until somewhen in mid-October at the earliest. What we do do is group teams into what we call "tiers"; eventually there'll be about twenty tiers, A through T or so, even when they're ranked (that's also how we project game outcomes) but at the very beginning of the season? We'll divide them up into two, three, four tiers...then six or seven...then maybe eight or ten..until we have enough information to rank them all, #1-127. (UAB football, rest in peace.)
But about THIS list? Look at these crunchy tidbits!
> Auburn 3 and Alabama 4? Delicious!
> OSU deserves #1, but MSU isn't very far behind at #5...
> Baylor at 2 and TCU way back at 6? But TCU's the one bringing their QB back!
> How about this one? Everett Golson goes to perennial playoff contender Florida St, #9... but the team he left is #7!
> Look at the Pac-12! UCLA #8, Oregon #10, Stanford #11, Arizona #13, USC #14, and Arizona State at #19! (Even Utah sneaking in at 27!) THAT will be a packed conference!
> The "Group of Five" better figure out a way to defeat Boise State! They start the season ranked this year...even a loss or two may not knock them out of the top non-Power spot! (Only BYU sits on the list, at #23, to challenge.)
> Oklahoma 22 and Okee State 25? Fun!
> Arkansas 26 and Texas 29? (Or OU/UT? Or...)
> And look who they've got sneaking in at #30! High hopes, indeed, Mr. Harbaugh!
Labels:
Alabama,
Arizona,
Arizona St,
Auburn,
Baylor,
Boise St,
Florida St,
Michigan,
Michigan St,
NCAA,
Notre Dame,
Ohio St,
Oklahoma,
Oklahoma St,
Oregon,
predictions,
Stanford,
TCU,
UCLA
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
Thursday, January 15, 2015
Comparing the final rankings...
It's always interesting to compare opinions, especially when the entire point of sports is to enjoy the competition between your guys and their guys and in doing so, comparing the two teams - and in the context of an entire season, comparing your guys to a slough of "their guys" and deciding how far up the ladder your guys are. (Ladies: "guys" is meant as a unisex term here.)
So, with that in mind, here's a list based on the Following Football #1-128 tiered ranking system that includes the final poll from the AP writers, the Sagaring rating system (if you need a primer in the Sagarin system, let me know!), the Massey Index (which compares and compiles 91 different computer and human ranking systems and then provides us with (for lack of a better term) a 'consensus' result), and the Superlist, which combines the six known meta-lists and gives us a different kind of consensus!
(The Sagarin rating and rank are in red simply to make the two connect visually better. The actual Sagarin rankings include the FCS teams: Eastern Michigan is really #208 in the country, out of 252! Also, the letters on the Massey rankings are tiers, just like FF uses: while these come from our hand, they're denoting the natural breaks in the totals - where there's a big gap between schools and where the groupings are.)
So, with that in mind, here's a list based on the Following Football #1-128 tiered ranking system that includes the final poll from the AP writers, the Sagaring rating system (if you need a primer in the Sagarin system, let me know!), the Massey Index (which compares and compiles 91 different computer and human ranking systems and then provides us with (for lack of a better term) a 'consensus' result), and the Superlist, which combines the six known meta-lists and gives us a different kind of consensus!
(The Sagarin rating and rank are in red simply to make the two connect visually better. The actual Sagarin rankings include the FCS teams: Eastern Michigan is really #208 in the country, out of 252! Also, the letters on the Massey rankings are tiers, just like FF uses: while these come from our hand, they're denoting the natural breaks in the totals - where there's a big gap between schools and where the groupings are.)
| Final | Final | Final | Final | |||||
| Final | Final | Sagarin | Massey | Superlist | AP | |||
| Ranking | Team | Conf | Record | rating | Ranking | Ranking | rank | |
| A1 | Ohio St | b10 | 14-1 | 100.81 | 1 | A1 | 1 | 1 |
| A2 | Oregon | pac | 13-2 | 95.71 | 4 | A2 | 2 | 2 |
| A3 | Alabama | sec | 12-2 | 96.83 | 3 | A3 | 3 | 4 |
| A4 | Florida St | acc | 13-1 | 84.86 | 16 | B7 | 6 | 5T |
| A5 | TCU | b12 | 12-1 | 99.58 | 2 | A4 | 4 | 3 |
| B06 | Michigan St | b10 | 11-2 | 93.36 | 6 | B+5 | 5 | 5T |
| B07 | Baylor | b12 | 11-2 | 90.57 | 7 | B8 | 8 | 7 |
| B08 | Georgia Tech | acc | 11-3 | 87.42 | 12 | C09 | 11 | 8 |
| B09 | Mississippi St | sec | 10-3 | 89.19 | 9 | C12 | 14 | 11 |
| B10 | Georgia | sec | 10-3 | 95.13 | 5 | B6 | 7 | 9 |
| B11 | UCLA | pac | 10-3 | 84.71 | 17 | C11 | 9 | 10 |
| C12 | Ole Miss | sec | 9-4 | 89.82 | 8 | C10 | 10 | 17 |
| C13 | Missouri | sec | 11-3 | 85.06 | 15 | D13 | 13 | 14 |
| C14 | Kansas St | b12 | 9-4 | 84.48 | 19 | E20 | 24 | 18 |
| C15 | Clemson | acc | 10-3 | 87.03 | 13 | D15 | 12 | 15 |
| C16 | Wisconsin | b10 | 11-3 | 83.48 | 21 | D14 | 15 | 13 |
| C17 | Auburn | sec | 8-5 | 88.40 | 11 | E16 | 17 | 22 |
| D18 | Boise St | mw | 12-2 | 77.43 | 36 | E17 | 19 | 16 |
| D19 | Arizona St | pac | 10-3 | 81.96 | 25 | E19 | 16 | 12 |
| D20 | USC | pac | 9-4 | 84.19 | 20 | E18 | 18 | 20 |
| D21 | Arizona | pac | 10-4 | 77.76 | 33 | E22 | 20 | 19 |
| D22 | LSU | sec | 8-5 | 85.53 | 14 | F25 | 26 | |
| D23 | Utah | pac | 9-4 | 82.75 | 23 | F26 | 23 | 21 |
| E24 | Texas A&M | sec | 8-5 | 82.82 | 22 | G29 | 27 | |
| E25 | Stanford | pac | 8-5 | 84.61 | 18 | F24 | 22 | |
| E26 | Arkansas | sec | 7-6 | 88.48 | 10 | F23 | 21 | |
| E27 | Nebraska | b10 | 9-4 | 81.09 | 29 | G28 | 30 | |
| E28 | Oklahoma | b12 | 8-5 | 81.47 | 27 | G30 | 31 | |
| E29 | Louisville | acc | 9-4 | 80.60 | 30 | G27 | 28 | 24 |
| E30 | Marshall | cusa | 13-1 | 82.36 | 24 | E21 | 25 | 23 |
| E31 | Notre Dame | ind | 8-5 | 79.83 | 31 | H+32 | 32 | |
| E32 | Minnesota | b10 | 8-5 | 76.17 | 37 | H34 | 35 | |
| E33 | Duke | acc | 9-4 | 74.99 | 41 | I40 | 40 | |
| F34 | Florida | sec | 7-5 | 81.48 | 26 | H+31 | 29 | |
| F35 | South Carolina | sec | 7-6 | 77.56 | 35 | I39 | 38 | |
| F36 | Colorado St | mw | 10-3 | 69.51 | 60 | I38 | 37 | |
| F37 | Memphis | aac | 10-3 | 76.11 | 38 | H33 | 34 | 25 |
| G38 | West Virginia | b12 | 7-6 | 78.53 | 32 | I+36 | 36 | |
| G39 | Washington | pac | 8-6 | 74.34 | 43 | J+43 | 39 | |
| G40 | Cincinnati | aac | 8-4 | 71.48 | 55 | J46 | 53 | |
| G41 | Miami-FL | acc | 6-7 | 75.08 | 40 | K49 | 51 | |
| G42 | Utah St | mw | 10-4 | 72.70 | 49 | J+41 | 45 | |
| H43 | North Carolina St | acc | 8-5 | 73.21 | 45 | J+42 | 42 | |
| H44 | Maryland | b10 | 7-6 | 72.39 | 52 | K54 | 48 | |
| H45 | Tennessee | sec | 7-6 | 81.39 | 28 | H35 | 33 | |
| H46 | Northern Illinois | mac | 11-3 | 68.08 | 65 | K53 | 54 | |
| H47 | Rutgers | b10 | 8-5 | 70.53 | 59 | J47 | 41 | |
| H48 | Penn St | b10 | 7-6 | 73.55 | 44 | K55 | 49 | |
| H49 | Air Force | mw | 10-3 | 67.79 | 69 | J45 | 47 | |
| I50 | Texas | b12 | 6-7 | 72.42 | 51 | K51 | 52 | |
| I51 | Oklahoma St | b12 | 7-6 | 72.46 | 50 | K50 | 44 | |
| I52 | Iowa | b10 | 7-6 | 73.13 | 46 | L+57 | 56 | |
| I53 | Boston College | acc | 7-6 | 74.36 | 42 | J48 | 50 | |
| I54 | Kentucky | sec | 5-7 | 73.04 | 47 | M70 | 64 | |
| J55 | Central Florida | aac | 9-4 | 71.18 | 56 | K56 | 61 | |
| J56 | East Carolina | aac | 8-5 | 69.44 | 62 | L62 | 69 | |
| J57 | BYU | ind | 8-5 | 71.61 | 53 | K52 | 55 | |
| J58 | Louisiana Tech | cusa | 9-5 | 77.57 | 34 | I37 | 46 | |
| J59 | Virginia Tech | acc | 7-6 | 75.30 | 39 | J44 | 43 | |
| J60 | Navy | ind | 8-5 | 68.05 | 66 | L+58 | 57 | |
| K61 | North Carolina | acc | 6-7 | 67.60 | 70 | M69 | 63 | |
| K62 | Georgia Southern | sun | 9-3 | 69.47 | 61 | L59 | 62 | |
| K63 | UL-Lafayette | sun | 9-4 | 66.68 | 71 | M66 | 67 | |
| K64 | Western Kentucky | cusa | 8-5 | 66.24 | 73 | L64 | 70 | |
| Final | Final | Sagarin | Massey | Superlist | ||||
| Ranking | Team | Conf | Record | rating | Ranking | Ranking | ||
| K65 | California | pac | 5-7 | 71.55 | 54 | M65 | 58 | |
| K66 | Oregon St | pac | 5-7 | 66.05 | 75 | N76 | 71 | |
| K67 | Michigan | b10 | 5-7 | 70.70 | 58 | L63 | 59 | |
| L68 | Western Michigan | mac | 8-5 | 64.84 | 80 | N75 | 78 | |
| L69 | Houston | aac | 8-5 | 67.89 | 68 | M-71 | 75 | |
| L70 | Pitt | acc | 6-7 | 70.86 | 57 | M68 | 72 | |
| L71 | Illinois | b10 | 6-7 | 65.10 | 77 | N+73 | 73 | |
| L72 | Nevada | mw | 7-6 | 64.28 | 81 | N+74 | 74 | |
| L73 | Toledo | mac | 9-4 | 68.01 | 67 | L61 | 65 | |
| M74 | Texas Tech | b12 | 4-8 | 66.48 | 72 | O+78 | 77 | |
| M75 | Virginia | acc | 5-7 | 72.79 | 48 | L60 | 60 | |
| M76 | Rice | cusa | 8-5 | 68.39 | 64 | M67 | 66 | |
| M77 | San Diego St | mw | 7-6 | 64.12 | 82 | N-77 | 79 | |
| M78 | Northwestern | b10 | 5-7 | 69.29 | 63 | M-72 | 68 | |
| N79 | Temple | aac | 6-6 | 65.00 | 79 | O81 | 83 | |
| N80 | Bowling Green | mac | 8-6 | 57.13 | 98 | P89 | 90 | |
| N81 | Arkansas St | sun | 7-6 | 65.04 | 78 | P+83 | 86 | |
| N82 | Central Michigan | mac | 7-6 | 62.07 | 87 | P86 | 88 | |
| O83 | Fresno St | mw | 6-8 | 59.13 | 92 | P88 | 85 | |
| O84 | UTEP | cusa | 7-6 | 61.44 | 89 | O82 | 80 | |
| O85 | UAB | cusa | 6-6 | 65.30 | 76 | O+79 | 82 | |
| O86 | Washington St | pac | 3-9 | 66.18 | 74 | O80 | 76 | |
| O87 | Texas St | sun | 7-5 | 58.75 | 93 | P90 | 92 | |
| O88 | Appalachian St | sun | 7-5 | 61.82 | 88 | P87 | 95 | |
| O89 | Kansas | b12 | 3-9 | 58.31 | 94 | Q95 | 91 | |
| O90 | Syracuse | acc | 3-9 | 62.97 | 84 | P91 | 87 | |
| O91 | South Alabama | sun | 6-7 | 55.89 | 104 | Q96 | 98 | |
| P92 | Purdue | b10 | 4-8 | 62.34 | 86 | Q94 | 94 | |
| P93 | Ohio | mac | 6-6 | 54.80 | 107 | R099 | 104 | |
| P94 | Middle Tennessee | cusa | 6-6 | 60.79 | 91 | P+84 | 84 | |
| P95 | Colorado | pac | 2-10 | 62.93 | 85 | Q+93 | 93 | |
| P96 | Iowa St | b12 | 2-10 | 61.38 | 90 | R+97 | 96 | |
| Q097 | UL-Monroe | sun | 4-8 | 55.96 | 103 | S107 | 108 | |
| Q098 | Ball St | mac | 5-7 | 57.68 | 96 | R102 | 105 | |
| Q099 | Wyoming | mw | 4-8 | 56.46 | 102 | R098 | 97 | |
| Q100 | Buffalo | mac | 5-6 | 53.54 | 110 | S108 | 114 | |
| Q101 | Wake Forest | acc | 3-9 | 56.50 | 101 | S+103 | 102 | |
| Q102 | Indiana | b10 | 3-9 | 64.04 | 83 | P+85 | 81 | |
| R103 | Hawai'i | mw | 4-9 | 56.78 | 100 | S106 | 101 | |
| R104 | Old Dominion | cusa | 6-6 | 58.08 | 95 | Q+92 | 89 | |
| R105 | South Florida | aac | 4-8 | 52.68 | 114 | S109 | 110 | |
| R106 | New Mexico | mw | 4-8 | 55.18 | 105 | R101 | 99 | |
| R107 | Vanderbilt | sec | 3-9 | 57.14 | 97 | R100 | 100 | |
| R108 | FIU | cusa | 4-8 | 56.99 | 99 | S104 | 106 | |
| S109 | Florida Atlantic | cusa | 3-9 | 53.75 | 109 | T+112 | 111 | |
| S110 | Akron | mac | 5-7 | 54.86 | 106 | S110 | 112 | |
| S111 | Tulane | aac | 3-9 | 53.29 | 112 | T+111 | 107 | |
| S112 | Army | ind | 4-8 | 51.59 | 117 | T116 | 116 | |
| S113 | North Texas | cusa | 4-8 | 52.95 | 113 | T115 | 113 | |
| S114 | Southern Miss | cusa | 3-9 | 53.54 | 111 | T113 | 115 | |
| T115 | San Jose St | mw | 3-9 | 52.04 | 115 | T114 | 109 | |
| T116 | UT-San Antonio | sun | 4-7 | 54.31 | 108 | S105 | 103 | |
| T117 | Miami-OH | mac | 2-10 | 50.26 | 118 | U120 | 121 | |
| T118 | Troy | sun | 3-9 | 46.10 | 123 | U122 | 122 | |
| T119 | Tulsa | aac | 2-10 | 48.43 | 119 | U118 | 118 | |
| T120 | UNLV | mw | 2-11 | 46.94 | 121 | U121 | 119 | |
| U121 | Kent St | mac | 2-9 | 47.47 | 120 | U119 | 120 | |
| U122 | U Massachusetts | mac | 3-9 | 51.69 | 116 | U117 | 117 | |
| U123 | U Conn | aac | 2-10 | 44.70 | 125 | V+123 | 123 | |
| U124 | Idaho | sun | 1-10 | 46.66 | 122 | V125 | 127 | |
| U125 | Eastern Michigan | mac | 2-10 | 38.77 | 128 | V126 | 126 | |
| U126 | SMU | aac | 1-11 | 39.15 | 127 | V124 | 124 | |
| V127 | New Mexico St | sun | 2-10 | 45.20 | 124 | V127 | 125 | |
| V128 | Georgia St | sun | 1-11 | 41.00 | 126 | V-128 | 128 |
A few interesting things to notice: Yes, Ohio State gets #1 in all systems, but not really unanimously. TCU actually had the highest Sagarin rating by two full points before the Buckeye beatdown on Oregon's finest...Florida State's position is as uncertain as ever: we still have them fourth, since we had them top four and in the playoff before it started; but some organizations drop them out of the top four, and in fact their rankings range from 4 down to 16!...Michigan State's in the top six in every system. Big month for the B1G!...Lotta love for Marshall in the final analysis - top 25 in all set-ups except ours...Also hard to believe the last place team in a division could be in the top 25, but Arkansas' annihilation of Texas and the last few games of their season is pushing their stock up into the high twenties!...Florida, Tennessee, Virginia Tech, and Louisiana Tech are all getting much higher rankings from all of the other systems than we gave them: I guess we're going to have to take another look, aren't we?...Certain combinations you tend to look for automatically, right? Nebraska finished ahead of Oklahoma across the board; Michigan is generally ahead of their directional schools, especially up-and-coming Western Michigan...Speaking of Broncos, how about Boise State, carrying the banner for the small programs once again - the first non-power conference team to win three BCS/New Year's Six games (only one to PLAY in that many, too!)...If this really was Alabama-Birmingham's last year of football, they fared commendably: 6-6, with every ranking between 76 and 85....The dis-honor of the lowest Power Conference team goes to Wake Forest, although within the FF rankings, Vanderbilt fell below the Demon Deacons....And, as always, the Bottom Twelve or so are set in concrete, with virtually identical membership from all four rating systems (Army gets its nose in twelfth from the bottom on the Sagarin scale) - Miami - OH, Troy, Tulsa, UNLV, Kent St, UMass, UConn, Idaho, Eastern Michigane, SMU, New Mexico St, and last place holder, Georgia St. A lack of sincerity in our congratulations to ALL of you!
Labels:
Arkansas,
Boise St,
Bottom Eight,
Florida,
Florida St,
Louisiana Tech,
Marshall,
Michigan,
Michigan St,
NCAA,
Nebraska,
Ohio St,
TCU,
Tennessee,
tiers,
UAB,
Vanderbilt,
Virginia Tech,
Wake Forest
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)