Yes, we've been negligent in our UPS and DOWNS this month, so let's see if we can make it up to you today with a BIG long list!
UP to the FIVE UNDEFEATED teams still left in the NFL at Hallow'een! I've heard different dates, but it's been many, many years since we've had five 6-0 teams - Green Bay, Cincinnati, Denver, Carolina, and New England. They're certainly deserving of their hallowed spots - New England and Green Bay were the consensus picks for Super Bowl combatants; Cincinnati's been tested repeatedly and looks better than any previous year in the Dalton era; and Cam Newton and that Carolina defense are doing just as well as Peyton Manning and that amazing Bronco defense! (Rephrase that: Cam's doing more that the legend, but the Denver D has been more impressive by far than any in the league.)
DOWN to the MOST DISAPPOINTING teams in the NFL this season... Baltimore fell to 1-6 last night, although a valiant effort to come back against a strong Arizona club fell short in the end zone. They've been within a score in every one of their games, and the Harbaugh coaching line will keep them competitive...but as for their own playoff hopes? Six losses is probably already as many as they can afford, and they're not going 9-0 the rest of the way. Seattle? Too early to say. Yes, they've lost more than expected, but they looked good against the Niners Thursday night. Can you call Chicago, Tampa, Tennessee, or Jacksonville "disappointing" if you weren't expecting anything from them? I think not. Certainly Detroit belongs on that list...
UP to the GREATEST NAME in modern football! Yesterday, in an effort to rearrange deck chairs on the Titanic, the Lions reneged on their promise not to change any coaches and changed coaches, firing the OC and replacing him with....wait for it...Jim Bob Cooter, a man who not only has the greatest name in the the business, but also a creative criminal record to boot: while he was at Tennessee several years ago, he was convicted of "aggravated assault" because he went into a woman's home, stripped down to his underwear, and climbed in bed with her. Had it been his wife, no worries. However, she didn't know him....OOPS! A promising move for Detroit.
DOWN to the MIAMI HURRICANE fans and alumni... who deserve whatever terrible coach they receive now that they've singlehandedly forced the ouster of Al Golden as their football coach. Certainly, the AD had no choice after the 58-0 debacle against Clemson, and even if you want to admit that the players seemed to play without interest, the firing only became necessary because the overzealous "fans" (remember, the word is short for "fanatic") demanded it. NOW...put yourself in the place of a prospective coach. Do you want to coach at Miami, having seen what they did to your predecessor? Miami was still 4-3, you know - not a bad season, although admittedly not national championship contenders. The expectations for a mid-level ACC program - and make no mistake: with the facility issues they have there, it IS a mid-level program! - are way overboard. If the poor fellow who takes the job ends his first four seasons has the same 32-25 record Golden did, I'll be impressed. And surprised.
UP to the DEPENDABILITY of the BOTTOM FEEDERS! As a phootball prophet of the lowest order, I depend on the reliability of the teams I work with in order to phorcast the outcomes of the games they play. We've seen an amazing array of turnabouts this year - for example, we expected Michigan to beat Michigan St, and they did...for the first 59:55 of the game, pre-punt. We thought Florida St would win over my son's beloved Ramblin' Wreck of Georgia Tech...until a field goal block returned for a game winner changed that outcome. We've seen ridiculous outcomes across the board - games I was absolutely SURE about came out the other way. AND YET, the one constant that keeps us above .500, above the line of sheer guess work? Well, it's the bottom feeder teams - the Savannah States, the Davidsons, the Missouri States, the New Mexico States, the Charlottes and Eastern Michigans, the Kansases of the world, that remind us that the sun will come up tomorrow in the east, set in the west, and repeat again and again. Knowing that Savannah will go to Stillwater and lose by eighty...knowing that one more Davidson Wildcat loss may be the one that pushes its Sagarin rating into negative numbers, knowing that the MVC is made up of nine amazing FCS teams...and Missouri State. That's what makes a prognosticator look smart!
DOWN to the GREG HARDY situation... I hate to say this, because it'll sound terrible...but I hope there's something medically or psychologically wrong with the Dallas Cowboys' two-game veteran defensive lineman Greg Hardy. If not, it means he's simply a complete a-hole, a jerk of gargantuan proportions. To barge into the special teams huddle (of which you have NO business being in at ALL, not being on special teams) and literally assault the ST coach is, by most standards of business practice, grounds for firing on its own, To then continue the infantile behavior with Dez Bryant (THERE's irony - Dez is the voice of reason?) and in the farcical press conference (no comment next question - wait for the question, meathead!) would be adequate grounds to be removed from the league, as no team would want you representing them in a pig-calling contest, much less in front of cameras ever again. But the real piece d'resistance, in my opinion, is his team's owner, the brilliant Jerry Jones, not only excusing his behavior (for which his coach, Jason Garrett, will not punish him at all), but praising his behavior as the kind of passion that they want their leaders to show! Congratulations, Dallas! You just sunk to number 33 on the list of my favorite NFL teams! (And yes, I realize there are only 32 teams. #32 on my list right now is being forced to watch highlights of the Chuck Pagano Special Teams Instructional video on permanent replay...)
DOWN to the idiots who would use the anonymity of Twitter and other social media to threaten athletes (AND their FAMILIES!) in ways they would never have the juevos to do in person. Without going into details, the fanatics who called out the poor Michigan punter following his dropped ball at the end of the Michigan State game were bad enough...the ones insulting the Dallas punt returner after his gaffe Sunday night were just as bad, although at least he's a professional athlete and "signed up" for the criticism. But the morons who went after his wife? What the heck? How do you figure she had anything to do with the dropped punt? Would they have gotten in her face had they met in the stadium? ...Wait a minute...maybe they would have. Didn't Giselle Brady have to deal with that after the Patriots lost a Super Bowl once? ...Sigh. It's amazing we ever evolved far enough as a species to come down from the trees. Apparently, we still fling our feces at each other for fun...
UP TO ALL OF YOU WHO READ THIS BLOG! Seriously, there's no profit margin or income of any sort involved in this project. It's simply a chance to continue a passion for football and the unpredictability of its outcomes, something my late wife and I started a few years ago on Facebook and then moved over to the blogosphere one year ago this month. To everyone who's ever read our work, which is now just my work, unfortunately... Thank you.
A forum for a variety of football forms - Australian Footy, American (college, NFL, and some HS), Canadian, and even a little round futbol and rounded rugby football when it comes up.
Showing posts with label Michigan St. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michigan St. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Monday, October 19, 2015
Maybe you just shouldn't punt!
After last night's disaster by the Indianapolis Colts (represented here, including a version by the Maine 1-AA team that shows how it might have meant to work), and the unbelievable last play of the Michigan/Michigan State game Saturday, perhaps we should all just go Pulaski Academy and never punt the ball again!
There's been a serious move in the "punt-less" direction over the last two years, where coaches "challenge the conventional wisdom" by going for it on fourth down around midfield, or even slightly on their own side of the field if it's short enough; but no somber commitment to the cause. I consider myself somewhat conservative in my approach, and here's the set of general rules I'd use as a head football coach if I were ever forced into the job...
Past midfield? Never punt.
Between your own 30 and midfield?Go for 4th and anything less than 3. Maybe 4-5, depending...
Behind your own 30? Go for 4th and 1 or less. Maybe 2...
(Subject to what kind of team I have, the opponent, the conditions, the time left in the game, etc.)
So, why don't more coaches punt less - like, WAY less? Here's the take of Paul Dalen, who wrote the piece for SB Nation about the math behind Pulaski's work linked above...
(Now, by the way, Kevin Kelley of Pulaski Academy also believes in onside kickoffs after almost every score - and they score a LOT; they're 10-0 this season - and now, he's planning on incorporating rugby style lateral passing into virtually every downfield play, something I've wondered about for years! WHY, if we think it'll work on the last play of the game, do we NEVER use downfield laterals the REST of the game? Wouldn't practicing it make it less dangerous by an order of magnitude or more?)
There's been a serious move in the "punt-less" direction over the last two years, where coaches "challenge the conventional wisdom" by going for it on fourth down around midfield, or even slightly on their own side of the field if it's short enough; but no somber commitment to the cause. I consider myself somewhat conservative in my approach, and here's the set of general rules I'd use as a head football coach if I were ever forced into the job...
Past midfield? Never punt.
Between your own 30 and midfield?Go for 4th and anything less than 3. Maybe 4-5, depending...
Behind your own 30? Go for 4th and 1 or less. Maybe 2...
(Subject to what kind of team I have, the opponent, the conditions, the time left in the game, etc.)
So, why don't more coaches punt less - like, WAY less? Here's the take of Paul Dalen, who wrote the piece for SB Nation about the math behind Pulaski's work linked above...
I don't think this kind of analysis would be a surprise to any decent coach. So, why do coaches "play it safe" (as if it weren't safer to make the choice to score more points)?
The answer to that, I think, lies in the way that we view errors of commission versus errors of omission. Or in other words, a coach that makes a choice to punt the ball from the 20-yard line would be viewed as making sound decisions, whereas one that chooses to go for it on the 20-yard line is considered a risk-taker. If the decision to punt turns out to be the decision that gives the ball back and the opponent then scores a TD, then the decision to punt is hardly considered as part of the evaluation of the sequence of events. If the decision to go for it fails and the opponent scores a TD, then the decision will be second-guessed ad nauseum. The result of both decisions is the same, but one would be criticized much more harshly than the other.
Humans are funny creatures.
We are indeed...we are indeed.(Now, by the way, Kevin Kelley of Pulaski Academy also believes in onside kickoffs after almost every score - and they score a LOT; they're 10-0 this season - and now, he's planning on incorporating rugby style lateral passing into virtually every downfield play, something I've wondered about for years! WHY, if we think it'll work on the last play of the game, do we NEVER use downfield laterals the REST of the game? Wouldn't practicing it make it less dangerous by an order of magnitude or more?)
Labels:
Colts,
funny,
Maine,
Michigan,
Michigan St,
oddities,
Pulaski Academy,
rugby
Friday, May 29, 2015
Is it too early to talk Top 30 in college football?
Yes. Yes it is.
However, Sports Illustrated doesn't think so, and they've put out their "post-spring camp Top 25" plus five more, and it's an interesting list to peruse...
1. Ohio State 11. Stanford 21. Georgia Tech
2. Baylor 12. Ole Miss 22. Oklahoma
3. Auburn 13. Arizona 23. BYU
4. Alabama 14. USC 24. LSU
5. Michigan St 15. Boise State 25. Oklahoma St
6. TCU 16. Clemson 26. Arkansas
7. Notre Dame 17. Missouri 27. Utah
8. UCLA 18. Georgia 28. Mississippi St
9. Florida St 19. Arizona St 29. Texas
10. Oregon 20. Wisconsin 30. Michigan
I find this list absolutely fascinating to contemplate, which is why I post it. At Following Football, we do NOT rank football teams until somewhen in mid-October at the earliest. What we do do is group teams into what we call "tiers"; eventually there'll be about twenty tiers, A through T or so, even when they're ranked (that's also how we project game outcomes) but at the very beginning of the season? We'll divide them up into two, three, four tiers...then six or seven...then maybe eight or ten..until we have enough information to rank them all, #1-127. (UAB football, rest in peace.)
But about THIS list? Look at these crunchy tidbits!
> Auburn 3 and Alabama 4? Delicious!
> OSU deserves #1, but MSU isn't very far behind at #5...
> Baylor at 2 and TCU way back at 6? But TCU's the one bringing their QB back!
> How about this one? Everett Golson goes to perennial playoff contender Florida St, #9... but the team he left is #7!
> Look at the Pac-12! UCLA #8, Oregon #10, Stanford #11, Arizona #13, USC #14, and Arizona State at #19! (Even Utah sneaking in at 27!) THAT will be a packed conference!
> The "Group of Five" better figure out a way to defeat Boise State! They start the season ranked this year...even a loss or two may not knock them out of the top non-Power spot! (Only BYU sits on the list, at #23, to challenge.)
> Oklahoma 22 and Okee State 25? Fun!
> Arkansas 26 and Texas 29? (Or OU/UT? Or...)
> And look who they've got sneaking in at #30! High hopes, indeed, Mr. Harbaugh!
However, Sports Illustrated doesn't think so, and they've put out their "post-spring camp Top 25" plus five more, and it's an interesting list to peruse...
1. Ohio State 11. Stanford 21. Georgia Tech
2. Baylor 12. Ole Miss 22. Oklahoma
3. Auburn 13. Arizona 23. BYU
4. Alabama 14. USC 24. LSU
5. Michigan St 15. Boise State 25. Oklahoma St
6. TCU 16. Clemson 26. Arkansas
7. Notre Dame 17. Missouri 27. Utah
8. UCLA 18. Georgia 28. Mississippi St
9. Florida St 19. Arizona St 29. Texas
10. Oregon 20. Wisconsin 30. Michigan
I find this list absolutely fascinating to contemplate, which is why I post it. At Following Football, we do NOT rank football teams until somewhen in mid-October at the earliest. What we do do is group teams into what we call "tiers"; eventually there'll be about twenty tiers, A through T or so, even when they're ranked (that's also how we project game outcomes) but at the very beginning of the season? We'll divide them up into two, three, four tiers...then six or seven...then maybe eight or ten..until we have enough information to rank them all, #1-127. (UAB football, rest in peace.)
But about THIS list? Look at these crunchy tidbits!
> Auburn 3 and Alabama 4? Delicious!
> OSU deserves #1, but MSU isn't very far behind at #5...
> Baylor at 2 and TCU way back at 6? But TCU's the one bringing their QB back!
> How about this one? Everett Golson goes to perennial playoff contender Florida St, #9... but the team he left is #7!
> Look at the Pac-12! UCLA #8, Oregon #10, Stanford #11, Arizona #13, USC #14, and Arizona State at #19! (Even Utah sneaking in at 27!) THAT will be a packed conference!
> The "Group of Five" better figure out a way to defeat Boise State! They start the season ranked this year...even a loss or two may not knock them out of the top non-Power spot! (Only BYU sits on the list, at #23, to challenge.)
> Oklahoma 22 and Okee State 25? Fun!
> Arkansas 26 and Texas 29? (Or OU/UT? Or...)
> And look who they've got sneaking in at #30! High hopes, indeed, Mr. Harbaugh!
Labels:
Alabama,
Arizona,
Arizona St,
Auburn,
Baylor,
Boise St,
Florida St,
Michigan,
Michigan St,
NCAA,
Notre Dame,
Ohio St,
Oklahoma,
Oklahoma St,
Oregon,
predictions,
Stanford,
TCU,
UCLA
Thursday, January 15, 2015
Comparing the final rankings...
It's always interesting to compare opinions, especially when the entire point of sports is to enjoy the competition between your guys and their guys and in doing so, comparing the two teams - and in the context of an entire season, comparing your guys to a slough of "their guys" and deciding how far up the ladder your guys are. (Ladies: "guys" is meant as a unisex term here.)
So, with that in mind, here's a list based on the Following Football #1-128 tiered ranking system that includes the final poll from the AP writers, the Sagaring rating system (if you need a primer in the Sagarin system, let me know!), the Massey Index (which compares and compiles 91 different computer and human ranking systems and then provides us with (for lack of a better term) a 'consensus' result), and the Superlist, which combines the six known meta-lists and gives us a different kind of consensus!
(The Sagarin rating and rank are in red simply to make the two connect visually better. The actual Sagarin rankings include the FCS teams: Eastern Michigan is really #208 in the country, out of 252! Also, the letters on the Massey rankings are tiers, just like FF uses: while these come from our hand, they're denoting the natural breaks in the totals - where there's a big gap between schools and where the groupings are.)
So, with that in mind, here's a list based on the Following Football #1-128 tiered ranking system that includes the final poll from the AP writers, the Sagaring rating system (if you need a primer in the Sagarin system, let me know!), the Massey Index (which compares and compiles 91 different computer and human ranking systems and then provides us with (for lack of a better term) a 'consensus' result), and the Superlist, which combines the six known meta-lists and gives us a different kind of consensus!
(The Sagarin rating and rank are in red simply to make the two connect visually better. The actual Sagarin rankings include the FCS teams: Eastern Michigan is really #208 in the country, out of 252! Also, the letters on the Massey rankings are tiers, just like FF uses: while these come from our hand, they're denoting the natural breaks in the totals - where there's a big gap between schools and where the groupings are.)
| Final | Final | Final | Final | |||||
| Final | Final | Sagarin | Massey | Superlist | AP | |||
| Ranking | Team | Conf | Record | rating | Ranking | Ranking | rank | |
| A1 | Ohio St | b10 | 14-1 | 100.81 | 1 | A1 | 1 | 1 |
| A2 | Oregon | pac | 13-2 | 95.71 | 4 | A2 | 2 | 2 |
| A3 | Alabama | sec | 12-2 | 96.83 | 3 | A3 | 3 | 4 |
| A4 | Florida St | acc | 13-1 | 84.86 | 16 | B7 | 6 | 5T |
| A5 | TCU | b12 | 12-1 | 99.58 | 2 | A4 | 4 | 3 |
| B06 | Michigan St | b10 | 11-2 | 93.36 | 6 | B+5 | 5 | 5T |
| B07 | Baylor | b12 | 11-2 | 90.57 | 7 | B8 | 8 | 7 |
| B08 | Georgia Tech | acc | 11-3 | 87.42 | 12 | C09 | 11 | 8 |
| B09 | Mississippi St | sec | 10-3 | 89.19 | 9 | C12 | 14 | 11 |
| B10 | Georgia | sec | 10-3 | 95.13 | 5 | B6 | 7 | 9 |
| B11 | UCLA | pac | 10-3 | 84.71 | 17 | C11 | 9 | 10 |
| C12 | Ole Miss | sec | 9-4 | 89.82 | 8 | C10 | 10 | 17 |
| C13 | Missouri | sec | 11-3 | 85.06 | 15 | D13 | 13 | 14 |
| C14 | Kansas St | b12 | 9-4 | 84.48 | 19 | E20 | 24 | 18 |
| C15 | Clemson | acc | 10-3 | 87.03 | 13 | D15 | 12 | 15 |
| C16 | Wisconsin | b10 | 11-3 | 83.48 | 21 | D14 | 15 | 13 |
| C17 | Auburn | sec | 8-5 | 88.40 | 11 | E16 | 17 | 22 |
| D18 | Boise St | mw | 12-2 | 77.43 | 36 | E17 | 19 | 16 |
| D19 | Arizona St | pac | 10-3 | 81.96 | 25 | E19 | 16 | 12 |
| D20 | USC | pac | 9-4 | 84.19 | 20 | E18 | 18 | 20 |
| D21 | Arizona | pac | 10-4 | 77.76 | 33 | E22 | 20 | 19 |
| D22 | LSU | sec | 8-5 | 85.53 | 14 | F25 | 26 | |
| D23 | Utah | pac | 9-4 | 82.75 | 23 | F26 | 23 | 21 |
| E24 | Texas A&M | sec | 8-5 | 82.82 | 22 | G29 | 27 | |
| E25 | Stanford | pac | 8-5 | 84.61 | 18 | F24 | 22 | |
| E26 | Arkansas | sec | 7-6 | 88.48 | 10 | F23 | 21 | |
| E27 | Nebraska | b10 | 9-4 | 81.09 | 29 | G28 | 30 | |
| E28 | Oklahoma | b12 | 8-5 | 81.47 | 27 | G30 | 31 | |
| E29 | Louisville | acc | 9-4 | 80.60 | 30 | G27 | 28 | 24 |
| E30 | Marshall | cusa | 13-1 | 82.36 | 24 | E21 | 25 | 23 |
| E31 | Notre Dame | ind | 8-5 | 79.83 | 31 | H+32 | 32 | |
| E32 | Minnesota | b10 | 8-5 | 76.17 | 37 | H34 | 35 | |
| E33 | Duke | acc | 9-4 | 74.99 | 41 | I40 | 40 | |
| F34 | Florida | sec | 7-5 | 81.48 | 26 | H+31 | 29 | |
| F35 | South Carolina | sec | 7-6 | 77.56 | 35 | I39 | 38 | |
| F36 | Colorado St | mw | 10-3 | 69.51 | 60 | I38 | 37 | |
| F37 | Memphis | aac | 10-3 | 76.11 | 38 | H33 | 34 | 25 |
| G38 | West Virginia | b12 | 7-6 | 78.53 | 32 | I+36 | 36 | |
| G39 | Washington | pac | 8-6 | 74.34 | 43 | J+43 | 39 | |
| G40 | Cincinnati | aac | 8-4 | 71.48 | 55 | J46 | 53 | |
| G41 | Miami-FL | acc | 6-7 | 75.08 | 40 | K49 | 51 | |
| G42 | Utah St | mw | 10-4 | 72.70 | 49 | J+41 | 45 | |
| H43 | North Carolina St | acc | 8-5 | 73.21 | 45 | J+42 | 42 | |
| H44 | Maryland | b10 | 7-6 | 72.39 | 52 | K54 | 48 | |
| H45 | Tennessee | sec | 7-6 | 81.39 | 28 | H35 | 33 | |
| H46 | Northern Illinois | mac | 11-3 | 68.08 | 65 | K53 | 54 | |
| H47 | Rutgers | b10 | 8-5 | 70.53 | 59 | J47 | 41 | |
| H48 | Penn St | b10 | 7-6 | 73.55 | 44 | K55 | 49 | |
| H49 | Air Force | mw | 10-3 | 67.79 | 69 | J45 | 47 | |
| I50 | Texas | b12 | 6-7 | 72.42 | 51 | K51 | 52 | |
| I51 | Oklahoma St | b12 | 7-6 | 72.46 | 50 | K50 | 44 | |
| I52 | Iowa | b10 | 7-6 | 73.13 | 46 | L+57 | 56 | |
| I53 | Boston College | acc | 7-6 | 74.36 | 42 | J48 | 50 | |
| I54 | Kentucky | sec | 5-7 | 73.04 | 47 | M70 | 64 | |
| J55 | Central Florida | aac | 9-4 | 71.18 | 56 | K56 | 61 | |
| J56 | East Carolina | aac | 8-5 | 69.44 | 62 | L62 | 69 | |
| J57 | BYU | ind | 8-5 | 71.61 | 53 | K52 | 55 | |
| J58 | Louisiana Tech | cusa | 9-5 | 77.57 | 34 | I37 | 46 | |
| J59 | Virginia Tech | acc | 7-6 | 75.30 | 39 | J44 | 43 | |
| J60 | Navy | ind | 8-5 | 68.05 | 66 | L+58 | 57 | |
| K61 | North Carolina | acc | 6-7 | 67.60 | 70 | M69 | 63 | |
| K62 | Georgia Southern | sun | 9-3 | 69.47 | 61 | L59 | 62 | |
| K63 | UL-Lafayette | sun | 9-4 | 66.68 | 71 | M66 | 67 | |
| K64 | Western Kentucky | cusa | 8-5 | 66.24 | 73 | L64 | 70 | |
| Final | Final | Sagarin | Massey | Superlist | ||||
| Ranking | Team | Conf | Record | rating | Ranking | Ranking | ||
| K65 | California | pac | 5-7 | 71.55 | 54 | M65 | 58 | |
| K66 | Oregon St | pac | 5-7 | 66.05 | 75 | N76 | 71 | |
| K67 | Michigan | b10 | 5-7 | 70.70 | 58 | L63 | 59 | |
| L68 | Western Michigan | mac | 8-5 | 64.84 | 80 | N75 | 78 | |
| L69 | Houston | aac | 8-5 | 67.89 | 68 | M-71 | 75 | |
| L70 | Pitt | acc | 6-7 | 70.86 | 57 | M68 | 72 | |
| L71 | Illinois | b10 | 6-7 | 65.10 | 77 | N+73 | 73 | |
| L72 | Nevada | mw | 7-6 | 64.28 | 81 | N+74 | 74 | |
| L73 | Toledo | mac | 9-4 | 68.01 | 67 | L61 | 65 | |
| M74 | Texas Tech | b12 | 4-8 | 66.48 | 72 | O+78 | 77 | |
| M75 | Virginia | acc | 5-7 | 72.79 | 48 | L60 | 60 | |
| M76 | Rice | cusa | 8-5 | 68.39 | 64 | M67 | 66 | |
| M77 | San Diego St | mw | 7-6 | 64.12 | 82 | N-77 | 79 | |
| M78 | Northwestern | b10 | 5-7 | 69.29 | 63 | M-72 | 68 | |
| N79 | Temple | aac | 6-6 | 65.00 | 79 | O81 | 83 | |
| N80 | Bowling Green | mac | 8-6 | 57.13 | 98 | P89 | 90 | |
| N81 | Arkansas St | sun | 7-6 | 65.04 | 78 | P+83 | 86 | |
| N82 | Central Michigan | mac | 7-6 | 62.07 | 87 | P86 | 88 | |
| O83 | Fresno St | mw | 6-8 | 59.13 | 92 | P88 | 85 | |
| O84 | UTEP | cusa | 7-6 | 61.44 | 89 | O82 | 80 | |
| O85 | UAB | cusa | 6-6 | 65.30 | 76 | O+79 | 82 | |
| O86 | Washington St | pac | 3-9 | 66.18 | 74 | O80 | 76 | |
| O87 | Texas St | sun | 7-5 | 58.75 | 93 | P90 | 92 | |
| O88 | Appalachian St | sun | 7-5 | 61.82 | 88 | P87 | 95 | |
| O89 | Kansas | b12 | 3-9 | 58.31 | 94 | Q95 | 91 | |
| O90 | Syracuse | acc | 3-9 | 62.97 | 84 | P91 | 87 | |
| O91 | South Alabama | sun | 6-7 | 55.89 | 104 | Q96 | 98 | |
| P92 | Purdue | b10 | 4-8 | 62.34 | 86 | Q94 | 94 | |
| P93 | Ohio | mac | 6-6 | 54.80 | 107 | R099 | 104 | |
| P94 | Middle Tennessee | cusa | 6-6 | 60.79 | 91 | P+84 | 84 | |
| P95 | Colorado | pac | 2-10 | 62.93 | 85 | Q+93 | 93 | |
| P96 | Iowa St | b12 | 2-10 | 61.38 | 90 | R+97 | 96 | |
| Q097 | UL-Monroe | sun | 4-8 | 55.96 | 103 | S107 | 108 | |
| Q098 | Ball St | mac | 5-7 | 57.68 | 96 | R102 | 105 | |
| Q099 | Wyoming | mw | 4-8 | 56.46 | 102 | R098 | 97 | |
| Q100 | Buffalo | mac | 5-6 | 53.54 | 110 | S108 | 114 | |
| Q101 | Wake Forest | acc | 3-9 | 56.50 | 101 | S+103 | 102 | |
| Q102 | Indiana | b10 | 3-9 | 64.04 | 83 | P+85 | 81 | |
| R103 | Hawai'i | mw | 4-9 | 56.78 | 100 | S106 | 101 | |
| R104 | Old Dominion | cusa | 6-6 | 58.08 | 95 | Q+92 | 89 | |
| R105 | South Florida | aac | 4-8 | 52.68 | 114 | S109 | 110 | |
| R106 | New Mexico | mw | 4-8 | 55.18 | 105 | R101 | 99 | |
| R107 | Vanderbilt | sec | 3-9 | 57.14 | 97 | R100 | 100 | |
| R108 | FIU | cusa | 4-8 | 56.99 | 99 | S104 | 106 | |
| S109 | Florida Atlantic | cusa | 3-9 | 53.75 | 109 | T+112 | 111 | |
| S110 | Akron | mac | 5-7 | 54.86 | 106 | S110 | 112 | |
| S111 | Tulane | aac | 3-9 | 53.29 | 112 | T+111 | 107 | |
| S112 | Army | ind | 4-8 | 51.59 | 117 | T116 | 116 | |
| S113 | North Texas | cusa | 4-8 | 52.95 | 113 | T115 | 113 | |
| S114 | Southern Miss | cusa | 3-9 | 53.54 | 111 | T113 | 115 | |
| T115 | San Jose St | mw | 3-9 | 52.04 | 115 | T114 | 109 | |
| T116 | UT-San Antonio | sun | 4-7 | 54.31 | 108 | S105 | 103 | |
| T117 | Miami-OH | mac | 2-10 | 50.26 | 118 | U120 | 121 | |
| T118 | Troy | sun | 3-9 | 46.10 | 123 | U122 | 122 | |
| T119 | Tulsa | aac | 2-10 | 48.43 | 119 | U118 | 118 | |
| T120 | UNLV | mw | 2-11 | 46.94 | 121 | U121 | 119 | |
| U121 | Kent St | mac | 2-9 | 47.47 | 120 | U119 | 120 | |
| U122 | U Massachusetts | mac | 3-9 | 51.69 | 116 | U117 | 117 | |
| U123 | U Conn | aac | 2-10 | 44.70 | 125 | V+123 | 123 | |
| U124 | Idaho | sun | 1-10 | 46.66 | 122 | V125 | 127 | |
| U125 | Eastern Michigan | mac | 2-10 | 38.77 | 128 | V126 | 126 | |
| U126 | SMU | aac | 1-11 | 39.15 | 127 | V124 | 124 | |
| V127 | New Mexico St | sun | 2-10 | 45.20 | 124 | V127 | 125 | |
| V128 | Georgia St | sun | 1-11 | 41.00 | 126 | V-128 | 128 |
A few interesting things to notice: Yes, Ohio State gets #1 in all systems, but not really unanimously. TCU actually had the highest Sagarin rating by two full points before the Buckeye beatdown on Oregon's finest...Florida State's position is as uncertain as ever: we still have them fourth, since we had them top four and in the playoff before it started; but some organizations drop them out of the top four, and in fact their rankings range from 4 down to 16!...Michigan State's in the top six in every system. Big month for the B1G!...Lotta love for Marshall in the final analysis - top 25 in all set-ups except ours...Also hard to believe the last place team in a division could be in the top 25, but Arkansas' annihilation of Texas and the last few games of their season is pushing their stock up into the high twenties!...Florida, Tennessee, Virginia Tech, and Louisiana Tech are all getting much higher rankings from all of the other systems than we gave them: I guess we're going to have to take another look, aren't we?...Certain combinations you tend to look for automatically, right? Nebraska finished ahead of Oklahoma across the board; Michigan is generally ahead of their directional schools, especially up-and-coming Western Michigan...Speaking of Broncos, how about Boise State, carrying the banner for the small programs once again - the first non-power conference team to win three BCS/New Year's Six games (only one to PLAY in that many, too!)...If this really was Alabama-Birmingham's last year of football, they fared commendably: 6-6, with every ranking between 76 and 85....The dis-honor of the lowest Power Conference team goes to Wake Forest, although within the FF rankings, Vanderbilt fell below the Demon Deacons....And, as always, the Bottom Twelve or so are set in concrete, with virtually identical membership from all four rating systems (Army gets its nose in twelfth from the bottom on the Sagarin scale) - Miami - OH, Troy, Tulsa, UNLV, Kent St, UMass, UConn, Idaho, Eastern Michigane, SMU, New Mexico St, and last place holder, Georgia St. A lack of sincerity in our congratulations to ALL of you!
Labels:
Arkansas,
Boise St,
Bottom Eight,
Florida,
Florida St,
Louisiana Tech,
Marshall,
Michigan,
Michigan St,
NCAA,
Nebraska,
Ohio St,
TCU,
Tennessee,
tiers,
UAB,
Vanderbilt,
Virginia Tech,
Wake Forest
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)